Agreed. Each language has its own strengths and weaknesses. Pick the one that works best for your situation, factoring in not only what the application needs to do, but your and your team's level of experience, and the overall community context in which the project will live. The peculiarities of a given languages truth tables, for example, can easily get washed out of the calculation when you consider what languages you know and what platforms your institution supports.
-Ian -----Original Message----- From: Code for Libraries [mailto:CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU] On Behalf Of Ethan Gruber Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:45 PM To: CODE4LIB@LISTSERV.ND.EDU Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] You are a *pedantic* coder. So what am I? Look, I'm sure we can list the many ways different languages fail to meet our expectations, but is this really a constructive line of conversation? -1 On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Justin Coyne <jus...@curationexperts.com>wrote: > I did misspeak a bit. You can override static methods in Java. My > major issue is that there is no "getClass()" within a static method, > so when the static method is being run in the context of the > inheriting class it is unaware of its own run context. > > For example: I want the output to be "Hi from bar", but it's "Hi from foo": > > class Foo { > public static void sayHello() { > hi(); > } > public static void hi() { > System.out.println("Hi from foo"); > } > } > > class Bar extends Foo { > > public static void hi() { > System.out.println("Hi from bar"); > } > } > > class Test { > public static void main(String [ ] args) { > Bar.sayHello(); > } > } > > > -Justin > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Eric Hellman <e...@hellman.net> wrote: > > > OK, pedant, tell us why you think methods that can be over-ridden > > are static. > > Also, tell us why you think classes in Java are not instances of > > java.lang.Class > > > > > > On Feb 18, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Justin Coyne > > <jus...@curationexperts.com> > > wrote: > > > > > To be pedantic, Ruby and JavaScript are more Object Oriented than > > > Java because they don't have primitives and (in Ruby's case) > > > because classes > > are > > > themselves objects. Unlike Java, both Python and Ruby can properly > > > override of static methods on sub-classes. The Java language made > > > many compromises as it was designed as a bridge to Object Oriented > programming > > > for programmers who were used to writing C and C++. > > > > > > -Justin > > > > > >
