With all due respect, you don’t know me and it is unfair to judge me. Actually it has nothing to do with notoriety. My agenda is not dubious. These are false statements. I wrote and was published before I even took this project on. If you read part one of the story, I outlined the reason for the story. I have received negative messages throughout this journey and I do have a right to protect myself. Each person involved in the story knows the real reason I wrote this story which is to bring awareness and frankly, that is all that matters. You can choose to believe me or not.
Sunni Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 28, 2019, at 11:32 AM, Valerie Forrestal > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Part of the problem is most of us know who that person is and their agenda is > dubious at best. There’s a reason they did not use their name and it has more > to do with notoriety than sensitive subject matter. > > -val > >> On Jun 28, 2019, at 12:29 PM, McDonald, Stephen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I would be more sympathetic to the original poster if their petition >> actually petitioned for something. Unfortunately, the "petition" on that >> website is simply a half dozen sentences basically saying "someone should >> pay attention to this" without actually suggesting what should happen, who >> should do it, who is sponsoring the petition, or what would happen to the >> petition once completed. It looked suspiciously like an attempt to get >> names and email addresses. >> >> Steve McDonald >> [email protected] >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Code for Libraries <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Chris Hoffman >> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 12:08 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] Note [administratativia] >> >> Thanks, Eric, I can appreciate your thinking. I also think there’s a fair >> likelihood that the poster may have felt they could not post with their full >> information due to the sensitive nature of the content. It’s unfortunately >> the case that there is still a lot of discrimination that victims of sexual >> harassment face, and I can imagine dozens of reasons someone would be >> nervous about trying to surface these issues. Hopefully there are other >> venues and mailing lists where S B can get the word out and gather >> information to help bring light to a very serious problem. >> >> Thanks for listening, >> Chris >> >> >> >>> On Jun 28, 2019, at 8:58 AM, Eric Lease Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 28, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Chris Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Eric, can I ask something? Was your concern about the posting from “S B” >>>> about the content of the message or the anonymous nature of the person >>>> posting? I think it would be good for this to be transparent. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Chris Hoffman, Ph.D. >>>> Associate Director, Research IT >>>> Program Director, Research Data Management >>>> <http://researchdata.berkeley.edu/> & Informatics Services UC >>>> Berkeley [email protected] >>>> 510-256-9643 >>> >>> >>> Chris, the short answer is, "Both". >>> >>> First of all, I was suspicious when the posting was not really signed. I >>> can over look signatures if the sender's email address is understandable. >>> In this case, there was no signature nor was the email address >>> understandable. Then, the content looked suspicious as well, with a link to >>> yet another understandable thing. >>> >>> -- >>> Eric Morgan
