On Apr 13, 2015, at 15:52:48, Quincey Morris <quinceymor...@rivergatesoftware.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:33 , Steve Mills <sjmi...@mac.com> wrote: > >> $(PRODUCT_NAME:rfc1034identifier) > > Personally, I always replace this with an explicit string on a project that’s > destined for public release. Part of it is old-fogeyism, because it annoys me > that the bundle ID might change without an explicit edit. Part of it is to > force it to lower case. But the main part of it is that once you’ve created > an explicit app ID in the developer portal, you don’t want to have to change > the bundle ID, *even if* you decide to change the product name in the Xcode > project. > > But that’s just me. I'd like to hear others' opinions about changing these to hard-coded values instead of the confusing, barely-documented rfc1034identifier crap. Really, the first time I saw $(PRODUCT_NAME:rfc1034identifier) in my Info.plist I thought the file was corrupt. That's NOT a good, human-readable (not even programmer-readable) thing to do. I'm with you on the old-fogeyism, but I also think it's neat when things just work automatically if I decide to change the app name, because I sure would want the UTI to change as well. The only problem is that horrible way that Apple is doing it. -- Steve Mills Drummer, Mac geek _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
