On Jan 29, 2015, at 22:21 , Ken Thomases <k...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > > Huh? It has to be an autorelease and not a release because the object needs > to survive to the caller's scope.
"Release" meant “eventual relinquishment of ownership”. Since we’re talking about ARC, I wasn’t assuming that it would be an actual auto-release. In the current implementation, it might be returned retained for eventual release in the caller’s scope, I think. Anyway, thanks for clarifying the main point. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
