On Oct 24, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Rick Mann <rm...@latencyzero.com> wrote:
>
> I discovered a neat property of Swift: Anywhere I can pass a closure, I can
> also pass a object method (of matching type), and if I reference it from an
> instance, it captures that instance for the call:
>
> class
> Foo
> {
> func actOnFoo(inValue: Int)
> {
> }
> }
>
> func
> neato()
> {
> var foo: Foo = Foo();
> doSomething(foo.actOnFoo);
> }
>
> func
> doSomething(inFunc: (Int) -> ())
> {
> }
>
> Inside doSomething(), is it possible to get at inFunc's "self" (in this case,
> it would be foo)?
Imagine there were a keyword that allowed this. What would it evaluate to if
the caller *didn’t* pass in a method, but rather a pure closure?
--Kyle Sluder
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
