On 3 Oct 2014, at 4:25 pm, Luc Van Bogaert <luc.van.boga...@me.com> wrote:
> Sure, the table will display 'layer' objects that can be stacked onto each > other. So the first layer should be displaced at the bottom of the stack, the > second layer on top of the first, and so on... So in fact, I would like to > have a table that represents a stack of objects that 'grows' upwards. All apps I've seen that show layers still start at the top, even if the lowest one represents the bottom (or rear-most) layer. Adding a new layer on top of the stack inserts a row at the top and all the rest move down. Tables are after all only a 'map' of your layers, as if someone had written down a list of them on paper. I've seen a more literal alternative that shows an actual stack of images layered in 3D with the 'current' layer exposed more fully and the remainder more edge-on (hard to describe but easy as a visual metaphor when you see it). Think a sort of vertical version of 'Cover Flow'. --Graham _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
