On Sep 15, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Jerry Krinock <je...@ieee.org> wrote: > On 2014 Sep 15, at 12:35, Kyle Sluder <k...@ksluder.com> wrote: > >> Can’t very well keep “only the onscreen views” if the table isn’t view-based… > > Makes sense! Are you implying that lazy loading is a side benefit of > view-based tables, and hence that this performance bottleneck is a legacy > that I could fix by dropping support for 10.6 and updating to a view-based > outline?
I don't think that's the case. One of the rationales for using NSCell and subclasses was that they were lightweight. Switching to views is somewhat heavier-weight but enabled by much faster computers since the old days. In other words, the old NSCell-based approach was, if anything, even more amenable to lazy loading. Regards, Ken _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
