And would be just like every other manual reference-counting scheme, with all of the additional code they entail, and the higher liklihood of bugs, and so on...
On Feb 16, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com> wrote: > The only way to resolve this without autorelease would be to enforce that > _all_ methods that return objects have to return a retained reference for > the caller to release. This would end up adding a huge number of > retain/release calls, which I'm pretty sure would affect performance. -- Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
