On 20 Sep 2013, at 4:41 AM, Dave <d...@looktowindward.com> wrote:

> Does anyone one know what Apple's acceptance criteria is for App to claim 
> that are iOS 7 ready?
> 
> I am working in an App that is VERY un-iOS 7 like, where iOS 7 uses white, it 
> uses Black and all the UI Elements are completely iOS 7 like.
> 
> The App basically works, but it does't look very nice. Does anyone know if 
> this will cause Apple to reject it?

Apple very carefully reserves the right to make judgments outside the 
legalistic reading of the guidelines, to prevent developers from gaming the 
system. So I don't know for sure, and unless your design is fairly 
conservative, nobody but your reviewer can tell you. 

There are lots of apps out there that go far beyond straight-UIKit, and WWDC 
speakers were enthusiastic about them. That you're using black instead of white 
is unlikely to be an issue (I'd bet), unless it affects usability. You say "the 
UI Elements are completely iOS 7 like." (Is there a missing "not?") It counts 
in your favor that you don't use standard elements in a confusing way.

But: "Basically works, but it does't look very nice" is a red flag. Apple says 
it might reject for shoddy appearance, and certainly would if you can't do 
better than "_basically_ works." It is very clear about not offering 
obviously-unfinished products to the public. If your app looks as though it 
were rushed out the door, you have a problem. (As anyone can tell you, there 
are (tens of?) thousands of apps in the App Store that fall short of Apple's 
standard of "beautiful" — I'm responsible for one or two myself — but there is 
a limit.)

        — F


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to