> The clang document which bbum links to says it has to be a typedef. So that > gives you two good reasons, one that the documentation mandates a typedef and > the other that Bill Bumgarner weighed in. So I'd say, if you want to try > this, you have to use a typedef.
It wasn't Bill linking to that doc it was Rob Napier. But I think your point still stands. The only comment Bill made was a request for the radar number to be made public. Going down the attribute route I think would be a win, but I think for now I'll stay safe. Kevin _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
