On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Greg Parker wrote: > On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Lee Ann Rucker <lruc...@vmware.com> wrote: >> On Sep 12, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Bill Cheeseman wrote: >>> As I recall, it stated that the "return [[x retain] autorelease]" pattern >>> is preferred for getters and gave many reasons for preferring it. >> >> Coincidentally enough, we've just hit a case where that's bad - it's a >> complicated situation with ObjC++ and C++ object lifetimes, resulting in an >> accessor that uses that pattern being called as a result of that object >> being in dealloc. By the time the autorelease pool pops the object it's >> trying to release is long gone. It's KVO unregistering, so there's not much >> we can do about it other than be smarter in our accessors. > > In some cases you can add an @autoreleasepool inside the object's -dealloc > method to catch these.
Ooh, yes, that works great! So many new language features, so little time... _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
