Hello, people!
After reading all this thread and watching it deviate from the problem at hand into a philosophical argument, I think it's time to answer the unanswered question... Rick Mann, I don't understand why you need a separate relationship to retrieve the active Child objects. Please, consider doing this: Parent children to-many to Child Child parent to-one to Parent active (boolean) And then create an activeChildren: method in Parent with returns only the active children. Sorry if this is not acceptable. I am just trying to help. Cheers, Flavio On 24/06/2013, at 04:07, cocoa-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote: > On Jun 23, 2013, at 09:11 , Gordon Apple <g...@ed4u.com> wrote: > >> On the original question asked in this thread, I have several similar >> places where I use a root object to also persist an object selection in the >> referenced collection. I could not see burdening the collection objects >> with another inverse relationship, so I just let these dangle, and ignore >> the compiler¹s complaints, because this is something that can usually be >> recovered from if there is a problem. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
