An educated guess would be that polling should be less efficient as the event 
based FSEvents.
Any reason you do not want to tap into the FSEvents API?

You concerns about weakening is nothing I would consider, as you're talking 
about reading, which should be considered harmless (in the physical sense, not 
the performance point of view)

-Michael

On 28.04.2013, at 19:43, Steven Degutis <sbdegu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a library I'm using that is reading a list of files every 0.5
> seconds and watching for the last-modified attribute to change.
> 
> Is this less efficient than using FSEvents? If so, how? For example, will
> it weak down the HDD or SSD faster? Run the battery of my laptop out
> sooner? Some other way?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -Steven
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
> 
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
> 
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/michael.starke%40hicknhack-software.com
> 
> This email sent to michael.sta...@hicknhack-software.com


___m i c h a e l   s t a r k e____ 
       geschäftsführer
       HicknHack Software GmbH
       www.hicknhack-software.com
       
___k o n t a k t____
       +49 (170) 3686136
       cont...@hicknhack.com
       
___H i c k n H a c k   S o f t w a r e   G m b H____
       geschäftsführer - maik lathan | andreas reischuck | michael starke
       bayreuther straße 32
       01187 dresden
       amtsgericht dresden HRB 30351
       sitz - dresden


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to