On Mar 22, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Chris Tracewell <ch...@thinkcl.com> wrote: > On Mar 22, 2013, at 1:51 PM, Quincey Morris > <quinceymor...@rivergatesoftware.com> wrote: >> or to add an explicit 'atomic' in only those cases where atomicity is >> required and (for custom accessors) actually implemented. > > Do you mean to add 'atomic' by not declaring 'nonatomic'? I just read that > 'atomic' is not an actual keyword and will cause a crash... but that thread > was from '09 --> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/588866/atomic-vs-nonatomic-properties
clang added support for (atomic) some time ago; Xcode 4.2, I think. -- Greg Parker gpar...@apple.com Runtime Wrangler _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
