On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:59 AM, Quincey Morris <quinceymor...@rivergatesoftware.com> wrote: > On Dec 27, 2012, at 22:37, Rick Mann <rm...@latencyzero.com> wrote: >> So, the usual bit about references being weak by default in C structs (and >> C++ classes) doesn't hold here. > > Huh? References aren't weak by default anywhere. > > Are you thinking of __usafe_unretained? That's not weak, just unmanaged by > ARC, and it's the only ownership qualifier allowed by ARC for struct members > that point to objects (and therefore highly unrecommended).
Just a quick clarification: this is not true in ARC-with-C++. Structs compiled in Objective-C++ mode are permitted to have __strong and __weak members. John. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
