> If I use this to initiate a background "thread":
>
>
> dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(0, 0), ^{
>
> // do some stuff
>
> [self runMyFunction];
>
> [self runAnotherFunction];
>
> // do some more stuff
>
> });
>
>
> My question is with my sample calling runMyFunction or runAnotherFunction are
> they blocking? Meaning will they block the background "thread" until they
> are complete and then it will continue? Or must I put them into another kind
> of block so that they finish FIFO? Thanks just looking for a confirmation as
> I'm moving to GCD from threads...
You are correct in that they are "blocking" if I understand you correctly.
There is nothing magic about the concept of GCD blocks, they are really just
anonymous functions with a slightly unusual scope. You would be equally welcome
to use the alternative dispatch_async_f API, which would have exactly the same
outcome (code written in Mail; not complied!):
void MyDispatchFunc(void *)
{
// do some stuff
[self runMyFunction];
[self runAnotherFunction];
// do some more stuff
}
void foo(void)
{
dispatch_async_f(dispatch_get_global_queue(0, 0), MyDispatchFunc);
}
I hope it is obvious from this alternative formulation that there is nothing
"magic" going on: the API call is just scheduling a call to MyDispatchFunc at
the time GCD deems appropriate. Exactly the same is true of the example you
gave, it is just that you are passing a block around instead of a function
pointer.
Hope that helps
Jonny
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
