On Jul 17, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Flavio Donadio <fla...@donadio.com.br> wrote:

> I already took a look at NSIncrementalStore and it seems to solve one of my 
> problems. I am fairly good with PHP, but I could always create a web service 
> with Rails or something else…

On the client side, it doesn’t matter what you use on the server side to create 
a web service. And vice-versa.

> One of my gripes with using HTTP as the client-server base protocol is the 
> request-response loop. This breaks a lot of desirable features. In my 
> particular case, I want my users to receive "real-time" updates when other 
> users edit records on the database (not really "real-time", but at least 
> after a COMMIT on the database).

Very few systems will actually do this for you, as it’s almost always *not* a 
desirable feature. For example, even if you use NSIncrementalStore to implement 
Core Data access to a web service, you won’t get this kind of functionality.

In general, users A and B may both be looking at their own 
internally-consistent data sets. If user A changes something that’s also part 
of what user B is looking at, you almost always want to keep user B’s view of 
the data the same until they either explicitly choose to refresh their view, or 
until they actually attempt to save their own changes. At that point you can 
allow user B to resolve the conflict between their own changes and user A’s 
changes to the same objects.

This is part of why there’s no “easy multiuser” in data management frameworks: 
The choices that need to be made often boil down to user experience, and can 
vary dramatically from one application to the next.

  -- Chris


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to