Le 31 mai 2012 à 22:28, Lane Roathe a écrit :
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devli...@shadowlab.org> wrote:
>
>> Le 31 mai 2012 à 18:00, Jens Alfke a écrit :
>>
>>> On May 31, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Antonio Nunes wrote:
>>>
>>>> static void *kMyVLFContext = &kMyVLFContext;
>>> ...
>>>> @synchronized(kMyVLFContext) {
>>>
>>> Huh? I thought the parameter to @synchronized(…) had to be an object
>>> reference?
>>
>>
>> The Objective-C reference agree with you.
>>
>> «The @synchronized() directive takes as its only argument any Objective-C
>> object, including self.»
>>
>> http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Chapters/ocThreading.html%23//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH19-SW1
>>
>> I'm surprised the compiler does not complain when passing an arbitrary
>> pointer.
>
> That's because the compiler can't know it's invalid, due to the use of void *
> as the var type (void * pretty much matches everything, including id, must
> like id matches any object reference).
> -lane
This is barely an excuse. Trying to send a message to a void * ptr result in
the following warning:
receiver type 'void *' is not 'id' or interface pointer, consider casting it to
'id'
So, the compiler is perfectly able to complain when you use a void* instead of
an objc object.
-- Jean-Daniel
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
