On May 5, 2012, at 15:43 , Martin Wierschin wrote: > All comparisons, including those used for the original sorting, were done > using the same comparison method/locale. And the sort order and search order > need to be same, otherwise any algorithms that rely on the transitive nature > of comparisons (eg: quicksort, binary search, etc) will fail.
Well, I guess you demonstrated that your particular comparison wasn't transitive. FWIW, I just tried it in the debugger on my US-locale 10.7.3, and I get: (lldb) p (NSComparisonResult)[@"laßt" localizedCaseInsensitiveCompare:@"laso"] (NSComparisonResult) $11 = 1 It's starting to look like a bug in 10.6.8, except that I have no idea why you & I got different answers in 10.7.3. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
