On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:14 AM, Ken Thomases wrote: > On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:06 AM, Charles Srstka wrote: > >> On Dec 18, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Ken Thomases wrote: >> >>> On Dec 18, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Charles Srstka wrote: >>> >>>> On Dec 18, 2011, at 2:31 AM, C.W. Betts wrote: >>>> >>>>> So I would do something along the lines of [NSArray >>>>> arrayWithObjects:ClassName1, ClassName2, nil]? >>>> >>>> Or just class1, class2, etc. where class1 and class2 are both of type >>>> Class. >>> >>> You can use pointers to class objects, but you can't just use class names. >>> If you are starting from class names, you use [ClassName1 class] to get the >>> class object. >> >> Well, you *could* just use class names, if you used NSClassFromString() >> before using the class. There wouldn’t be much point in doing that, though, >> since class objects can fit inside arrays and would be more convenient to >> use here. > > Did you mean for this to be off-list? Anyway, I took his use of ClassName1 > to mean an identifier. After all, he didn't write @"ClassName1”.
Nope, sorry, that was meant to be on-list. You’re probably right — I had assumed that those were meant to be NSString variables, since that’s what you’d need to be using if you were storing class names. Wasn’t thinking from an Obj-C newbie perspective there; sorry. At any rate, getting the class object by calling +class is, of course, the correct thing to do. Charles _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
