On Dec 14, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Keary Suska wrote:

> On Dec 14, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Dave Reed wrote:
> 
>> Here's my sorting scenario with a few more details.
>> 
>> Entity A (the one I'm fetching) has a to-one relation to Entity B with 
>> attribute b. Let's call the relation "tob" so my sort descriptor said 
>> withKey:@"tob.b" and it results of the fetch request did not come back in 
>> that order, but if I then sort the resulting array using the sort 
>> descriptor, it does sort it.
>> 
>> The way I read the documentation, that should work during the fetch, but it 
>> doesn't. 
> 
> Unfortunately, Core Data-Specific sort descriptor docs are fairly lacking. As 
> I mentioned it may be that NSSortDescriptor doesn't translate key paths like 
> NSPredicate might. It may expect them to be appropriate to a SQL query. 
> Considering that the attribute b or entity B is unambiguous (i.e. entity A 
> does not have an attribute with the same name), have you tried passing just 
> "b" as the key? Another option is passing "B.b" as the key.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Keary Suska
> Esoteritech, Inc.
> "Demystifying technology for your home or business"

No, neither of those work either, but thanks for the suggestions. I'll just 
sort the array afterwards. I'm more worried about the fetch requests not 
matching the data I want so I'll check closely for that while testing. This is 
my first attempt at Core Data as my other iOS app was written when iOS 2.0 was 
out and Core Data didn't exist for iOS then. It certainly removes a lot of code 
but there is the trade-off of the mystery of what it's doing vs. sqlite which I 
know what it's doing.

Thanks,
Dave


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to