On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:05:00 -0800, G S <stokest...@gmail.com> said: >Turns out there's an Xcode bug behind this. Hard to imagine, I know. > >We don't use build numbers; just version numbers. I noticed that the >target summary's Version field was blank, but the Build field wasn't. >Swapping those states led Xcode to inexplicably remove the version >from the plist entirely. > >Screen shot: > >http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7005/6496731123_62ed9b4063_b.jpg
This is all made much more complicated by the fact that it's utterly unclear what Apple wants from these values. The documentation is about as coy and opaque as it gets (and that's pretty darned coy and opaque). My policy is to disbelieve everything everybody says on this topic and supply the same value for both fields and pray we get past the Guardians. m. -- matt neuburg, phd = m...@tidbits.com, <http://www.apeth.net/matt/> A fool + a tool + an autorelease pool = cool! Programming iOS 4! http://www.apeth.net/matt/default.html#iosbook_______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
