On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:14 PM, David F. <dav...@gmx.us> wrote: > Aki, is it really a good idea for the text system to automatically apply an > inverted text matrix? The text is *not* rendered correctly just by applying > an inverted text matrix to the font: for example, underlines and > strikethroughs aren't drawn correctly if the context isn't flipped.
I think one of the biggest misunderstandings is that -isFlipped does not actually dictate the flippedness of the graphics context. If a graphics context returns YES from -isFlipped, all that means is that the caller may presume that a flip has been applied to the CTM. The layout manager uses this hint to determine if it needs to flip the context its drawing context for the glyphs. --Kyle Sluder _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
