My point was really that a developer should at the least be aware if he's using a hack. Unless this is a published interface, it's a hack that might break.
Apple is certainly able to do a dot rev of all the iLife apps simultaneously. -Ken On Jan 16, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote: > I used parts of the iMedia browser (the objects that retrieve the images from > the iPhoto database) in an app that has been accepted on the App Store. > > While I guess that the layout of the iPhoto database on disk could change, > all the iApps access it so if it changed they'd have to all be revved and > upgraded at once. Also, the way the layout works it's to a large extent > self-correcting - the 'master dictionary' contains full paths to the > individual files so provided those keys are still present in a changed > layout, the actual images will still be found. > > --Graham > > > On 17/01/2011, at 3:06 AM, Ken Ferry wrote: > >> The project page does not make it clear whether or not that is a hack. Is >> that supported, or, for example, would you get rejected from the mac app >> store for depending on stuff that changes between OS versions? >> >> -Ken > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
