My question is why do you need to have a 'const' pointer. On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Jonny Taylor wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm not sure if I understand exactly what you're asking. I would > like to be able access the "frame number" property (which is in fact stored > as a variable within the class, and is fixed soon after instantiation) in > spite of the fact that I only have a 'const' pointer to the object at the > time I want to access it. Semantically I don't see why it should be unsafe to > attempt to find out the value of that property. -- David Duncan _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
