Thanks for the suggestions! Yeah sorry I was getting around to fixing that return NSApplication thing.
here's another version that avoids higher level framework usage.. http://pastebin.com/20W1ZD8r Does that look better? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Ken Thomases <k...@codeweavers.com> wrote: > On Sep 13, 2010, at 3:05 AM, aaron smith wrote: > >> Thanks for pointing that I can't use high level frameworks in a child. >> I'll set up everything I need for the execvp call before the actual >> fork. > > You haven't addressed the problem. I was not talking about the later fork(), > but the first one. These two lines: > > pid_t child = fork(); > if(child==0) return NSApplicationMain(argc,(const char **)argv); > > are untenable. You are running the bulk of the original application in a > forked-but-not-exec'ed child process. Your whole approach to this issue is > unworkable. > > Sorry, > Ken > > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
