Thank you Quincey! I think I got the right way this time, But I would appreciate one last explanation.
First: This is what I did: "Child" entity relationships: Child.children ->> Child and its inverse : parentChild #1 Child.parentChild ->>Child and its inverse : children #2 Child.parentFile ->> File and its inverse: children #3 "File" entity relationships: File.children->>Child and its inverse: parentChild #4 File.files->>File and its inverse: parentFile #5 File.parentFile->>File and its inverse: files #6 I understood why #1, #2, #5 and #6 are the way they are but why is #3 and #4? I think they are right because there is really not other option in the pull-down menu for each of them (#3 and #4). What would it be a good explanation for a inverse? ie.: Regarding #1 "children" contains many "Child" and ...???... "parentChild". What would be the verb/word that completes above sentence? Thanks for your help in advance Ignacio BTW: I couldn't interpret what File <-parentFile- File was in: > Now let's add the inverses: > > File -files->> File > File <-parentFile- File (This line) > > Child -children->> Child > Child <-parentChild- Child (This line) > > File -children->> Child > File <-parentFile- Child (Also this one) > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
