On 24 Feb 2010, at 22:57, Michael A. Crawford wrote:

> Part of your response suggests that if there was an existing framework that 
> was openly available, it wouldn't do me any good because the bad guys would 
> have the source code.

I disagree. If it's based on a tried and tested (and occasionally formally 
verified) crypto system, knowing the algorithm doesn't lead to a crack. 
Weaknesses would come through bugs in the framework (or incorrect application 
of it), and the more people who can see the source the greater chance there is 
that good people as well as bad can find the issues. Good people fix 'em.

Cheers,
Graham.

-- 
Graham Lee
http://blog.securemacprogramming.com/
Coming soon - Professional Cocoa Application Security
http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0470525959.html

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to