Thanks. Makes sense. Will do... On Feb 9, 2010, at 4:05 PM, David Duncan wrote:
> There is, but it is just not recommended (you can test from UIDevice). > Generally the concept is "test for what you need" because you don't know what > the configuration will be. Two examples: > > 1) Someone adds a GPS unit to an iPod Touch that provides Compass heading > information. Should you treat the device like an iPod or an iPhone? > > 2) Should removes the Camera from an iPhone. Should you treat it as an iPod > or iPhone? > > For this and many more reasons it makes a lot more sense to design your > application based on available capabilities rather than your perceived notion > of what is an iPhone vs iPod Touch. > > On Feb 9, 2010, at 3:57 PM, MARC BLATT wrote: > >> Thanks. So I guess the answer is there's no simple [self isiPhone] or [self >> device] call that would return a constant like the OS version. Having two >> different devices (soon to be three) on this OS, I believe it would be a >> useful cocoa method. Think it's worth submitting a feature request? > > -- > David Duncan > Apple DTS Animation and Printing > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com