On May 7, 2009, at 10:39 , Jeff Johnson wrote:
Actually, you were initially claiming that there was such a guarantee, and misquoting the docs to 'prove' your point.

The memory management docs tell you what you should do, but nothing in Objective-C or Cocoa requires you to follow them.

Well, the docs don't give the callee any guarantees in terms of lifetime of returned objects, and certainly no way to "tunnel" through the caller (except for keeping a retain on the object, keeping ownership). I am now aware that you are of the opinion that there should be such guarantees, and it is obvious that I won't be able to change your mind, so we should just let that be.

Furthermore, I think you can count on Apple to not do anything like that (and if they do, it's a bug they ought to fix). Why do you think they suggest creating an autorelease pool inside your NSXMLParser callback rather than just doing it themselves automatically?

Because they forgot to do it initially, and then when they found that their memory consumption was out of the ballpark wanted to add the pools but couldn't because some client code they didn't want to break was already assuming longer lifetimes than it had any rights to assume.

That's an, er, interesting opinion.

It's actually somewhat more than an opinion...

And yes, the code that I use explicitly runs the runloop, and it is the code that runs the runloop that both allocates the NSURLConnection and then cleans up after it checks the flag. Perfectly safe, perfectly synchronous.

That's not what I was talking about. I was talking about the possibility that the 'owned' caller manually runs the run loop right after it calls the delegate callback, so any performSelector: called by the delegate will be performed after the delegate callback returns but within the scope of the caller. How do you protect against that?

*I* don't. It is you who wants these sorts of guarantees and protections. I code in ways that don't assume these sorts of protections.

Anyway, I have given you the information about how this stuff works. I understand your opinions on how you feel this stuff should work.

Good luck,

Marcel

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to