Thanks Graham.

I haven't tried either of the methods I mentioned so far (because I'm
lazy, sorry:), but what I have tried is I created NSData from the
large object by using NSKeyedArchiver. It has taken forever, so that I
had to force-quit the process. That's why I am asking if the same
thing is going to happen with piples and DO? Or maybe I'm doing
something wrong?

By "large" I mean about 10-100 MB. I don't think I am going to hit the
boundary of VM anyway.

Any ideas?


On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> On 13/04/2009, at 4:09 PM, Oleg Krupnov wrote:
>
>> I need to pass objects from one task (child) to another (parent) on
>> the same machine.
>>
>> Currently I am considering two alternatives: Pipes vs Distributed
>> Objects, and my main concern is performance, because the object is
>> really large.
>
> How large is "really large"?
>
> 10MB, 1GB, 500GB?
>
>> 1) Are DO going to be faster?
>
> Why don't you measure and see?
>
> Basically, if the processes are on the same machine, passing the object is a
> memory-to-memory copy (notwithstanding VM), so it's going to be *extremely*
> fast. If the object is large the data content will completely dominate the
> "wrapping" used to transport it, so I'll bet any method is as good as any
> other. If the object is so large that VM is going to constrain you in any
> meaningful way, you could always write it to disk then map that file into
> the second process. Avoiding copying the data at all is surely your best bet
> once you exceed a certain size threshold, but I'd bet that the threshold is
> *huge*, so it comes down to what you mean by "really large".
>
> --Graham
>
>
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to