On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Steve Cronin <steve_cro...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> I use an object in my application called 'appDelegate'; it's a subclass of
NSObject.
>
> I instantiate this object in the main Nib file
> This object has IBActions for the main menu and since it is -app delegate
it is a kind on central dispatcher.
>
> My question is this:
> The +initialize is run twice when the app loads:
> 2009-03-16 20:21:42.690 XYZ[6676:813] *[AppDelegate initialize]
> 2009-03-16 20:21:42.781 XYZ[6676:813] *[NSKVONotifying_AppDelegate
initialize]
>
> Once for the object itself and then again as the instance in the Nib.
That's how I read this. Is that wrong?
Not entirely, but not entirely right either. The +initialize message is sent
once to each subclass too, and that's what is happening here. When you use
Cocoa Bindings, the bindings machinery replaces the isa variable in your
AppDelegate instance with one that refers to a subclass of AppDelegate
that's created at run time - that's the NSKVONotifying_AppDelegate class
mentioned above. So it's not your AppDelegate class that's getting sent a
second +initialize message, it's the NSKVONotifying_AppDelegate being sent
its first (and only) +initialize message. Since that class doesn't implement
its own +initialize, then naturally the message is routed to its parent
class instead - the +initialize implementaion in your AppDelegate class.
The obscure part of this is that KVO is creating a subclass for you, and
it's the subclass' +initialize that you're actually seeing. Once you
understand the situation, the solution to it easy - it's right there in the
docs for the method:
If a particular class does not implement initialize, the initialize method
of its superclass is invoked twice, once for the superclass and once for the
non-implementing subclass. If you want to make sure that your class performs
class-specific initializations only once, implement initialize as in the
following example:
@implementation MyClass
+ (void)initialize
{
if ( self == [MyClass class] ) {
/* put initialization code here */
}
}
Incidentally, does anyone else find this behavior rather odd? I'd expect KVO
to create +initialize methods automagically, to avoid this kind of
confusion. :-(
sherm--
--
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
