> That's likely to produce > higher-resolution results. In some experiments with controlling finicky hardware, I discovered that usleep has surprisingly high precision--I forget the numbers, but you can pretty reliably sleep for a time substantially shorter than the scheduling quantum. (Of course, if your process gets switched out, you will sleep longer. Also note that I was testing on an 8-core machine, so my process didn't need to spend terribly much time switched out...)
-- Scott Ribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.killerbytes.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
