On Nov 6, 2008, at 21:23, HAMILTON, Steven wrote:

I think I'm missing something with Core Data. Value attributes always appear to be stored as an NSNumber with the exception of Decimal types which are stored as NSDecimalNumber. If I choose an attribute to be INT64 then this type doesn't seem to be enforced. I can store any valid NSNumber object in that attribute. There's two issues with understanding;


1) I just want to store INT scalar values. I don't want an Object class stored at all. I want an INT back, not an NSNumber.


2) I want the type enforced so I can't store a decimal when I want an INT.


The docs make no mention of NSNumber's being returned. They all mention normal scalar values.

Core Data is an object-graph system. Its attributes are objects. You can't stop it from storing numbers as objects, and you can't make it store anything as a non-object. (It wouldn't save you much because you don't want to store scalar memory-bit-images -- they're not portable between architectures. NSNumbers take care of bit/byte ordering and floating point representation issues for you for free.) So now you have 2 issues:

1. What if I want scalar accessors?

You write your own. The documentation is a bit obscure, because it mostly talks about more complicated accessor scenarios:

http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CoreData/Articles/cdAccessorMethods.html#/ /apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40002154-SW14 http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CoreData/Articles/cdNSAttributes.html#/ /apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001919

but it's fairly straightforward for numeric types. You specify that your data model entity has a custom class, then write it along these lines:

        @interface MyManagedObject : NSManagedObject
        ...
        @property NSInteger myInteger;
        ...
        @end
        
@interface MyManagedObject (CoreDataGeneratedPrimitiveAccessors) // to keep the compiler from complaining ...
        - (NSNumber*) primitiveMyInteger;
        - (void) setPrimitiveMyInteger: (NSNumber*) value;
        @end
        
        @implementation MyManagedObject
        ...
        - (NSInteger) myInteger {
                [self willAccessValueForKey: @"myInteger"];
                NSNumber *value = self.primitiveMyInteger;
                [self didAccessValueForKey: @"myInteger"];
                return [value integerValue];
        }
        - (void) setMyInteger: (NSInteger) newValue {
                [self willChangeValueForKey: @"myInteger"];
                self.primitiveMyInteger = [NSNumber numberWithInteger: 
newValue];
                [self didChangeValueForKey: @"myInteger"];
        }
        ...
        - (void) setNilValueForKey: (NSString*) key {
                if ([key isEqualToString: @"myInteger"])
                        self.myInteger = 0; // or however else you want to 
handle this
                else
                        [super setNilValueForKey: key];
        }
        ...
        @end

You can actually get most of this by using Xcode's Design | Data Model | Copy Obj-C 2.0 Method Implementations to Clipboard function, and then massage the code it gives you.

Because you have to go to some trouble to provide scalar accessors, it's worth asking whether you want them enough to write the code for them.

2. What if I want the number range to be limited to a certain number of bits (like 32)?

I would assume, though I haven't tested it, that if you try to save a NSNumber that lies outside the range of its Core Data entity type, you'll get a validation error at save time. You can prevent this by properly validating your numeric attributes. It's not precisely an issue with NSNumbers, but something you need to deal with generally.

If you're worried about setting a NSNumber with a non-integral value to an attribute of integral type, it's much the same as assigning a float to an int -- there's no compiler warning, and the fractional part disappears. Well, with NSNumbers, the fractional part doesn't actually disappear, but may be harmless. If it matters, you can apply validation to that, too. You might get a validation error at save time, I don't know.

Of course, if you write your own scalar accessors, there is no NSNumber range issue.


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to