> Do you really mean this? As far as I've heard,
> Apple's official
> stance has never been to classify Carbon as a legacy
> technology
> (though they've certainly taken all the steps). Can we
> finally settle
> this issue and start calling things as they are?
>
> Of course there is the whole issue of "What is
> Carbon?". Perhaps you
> are restricting your classification to things like
> HIToolbox?
If you can't compile it for 64 bit architecture, then its legacy.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
