On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Quincey Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lastly, before I shut up, in both Markus's question and the thread that Adam > referred to, the idea was to trigger a KVO update when the property value > was known to have *not* changed. In those circumstances, I still believe, > the "emptiness" of the willChange/didChange is moot -- if triggering a KVO > update is the correct thing to do in that case, then calling > willChange/didChange is a valid way to do it in that case.
Right, but why are you doing this? If the value hasn't changed, then there should be no point in triggering a KVO update, because the entire purpose of a KVO update is to notify when the value changes. Needing to send such an empty update is indicative of some sort of problem with your code. Mike _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]