On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Michael Ash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although Apple's sample code shows overriding -bind:... to store > information about the new binding, it doesn't look like this is > necessary. You can simply use -infoForBinding: to obtain the info > dictionary, extract the bound object and key, and use that information > to update the model object. I'd assume this is what the Apple classes > do, and it seems to me to be a lot simpler than overriding -bind:... > to stash away a bunch of information that's already being stored for > you anyway. That would seem a pretty reasonable assumption, but it doesn't seem to be the case. At least, breakpoints on -[NSTextField infoForBinding:], -[NSControl infoForBinding:], -[NSObject infoForBinding:] don't seem to trigger when the text field is edited; nor are messages logged from a subclass of NSTextField overriding -infoForBinding:. Any other ideas, anyone? Thanks, Hamish _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
