> On Apr 19, 2022, at 5:26 PM, Sean McBride via Cocoa-dev
> <cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com> wrote:
>
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 18:47, Saagar Jha wrote:
>
>> If Thread Sanitizer says your code has a race, it almost certainly has a
>> race.
>
> Yeah, that's been my general experience until now.
>
>> Your simple code seems OK superficially, but there are a couple things that
>> could be problematic here: either your real code is actually mutating
>> something, or (unlikely) you are touching some internal state, perhaps a CoW
>> optimization, that is not visible to you but is silently changing things
>> under the hood.
>
> In case it wasn't clear, the code snippet in my email actually reproduces the
> issue. I created a fresh Xcode project and it's literally just:
>
> - (void)applicationDidFinishLaunching:(NSNotification *)aNotification {
> NSArray* array = @[@5, @6, @7, @8, @9, @10, @11];
>
> [array enumerateObjectsWithOptions:NSEnumerationConcurrent
> usingBlock:^(NSNumber* num, NSUInteger idx, BOOL* stop) {
> array[idx];
> }];
> }
>
> TSan complains with this on macOS 12.3.1 on an M1 Mac Mini with Xcode 13.3.
> But on an Intel Mac Pro, macOS 11.6.6 with Xcode 13.2.1, TSan does not
> complain.
>
>> In any case, I would generally suggest using -[NSArray
>> enumerateObjectsAtIndexes:options:usingBlock:] with the
>> NSEnumerationConcurrent flag, which should rule out any issues with
>> concurrent access on the array itself.
>
> I tried enumerateObjectsWithOptions:usingBlock: and TSan doesn't complain
> with it. But I was suspicious of that and added an NSLog to print the index,
> and even after adding random sleeps:
>
> [array enumerateObjectsWithOptions:NSEnumerationConcurrent
> usingBlock:^(NSNumber* nub, NSUInteger idx, BOOL* stop) {
> usleep(arc4random_uniform(1000000));
> NSLog(@"idx: %d", idx);
> array[idx];
> }];
>
> The thing is *not* running concurrently on the M1. The indices are always
> printed in order. Weird.
The docs for NSEnumerationConcurrent state that it is a hint and may be
ignored at run time. If you absolutely need it to be run on multiple threads
you should do it explicitly, IMO, with dispatch_async and appropriate critical
section locking.
—Rob
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
