Well - 2AM and I finally resolved it. I also think I understand why the strange 
recursion occurs 

This double-layer binding of content-array of one NSArrayController to the 
arrangedObjects of another NSArrayController (who’s bound to an ordered 
relation of…. ) made loading to occur like this.

1 “Measurements” array controller loads 1 entity. It rearranges its objects. 
This triggers: 
2. “Used Species” array controller to reload and rearrange its content array. 
This puts to use the computational key path @distinctUnionOfObjects.species 
that scans all the “Measurements” arrangedObject.
3, Measurements array controllers loads another entity, now having two - and 
rearranges its objects again. Triggers 
4. “Used Species” array controller to reload and rearrange its content array. 

And so on.

What I did, is to add a calculated property to the File’s Owner (the 
WindowController) providing this needed ContentArray in one shot: 

@property (readonly, nonatomic) NSArray *speciesInUse;


-(NSArray *) speciesInUse {
    return [self.representedObject.measurements.array 
valueForKeyPath:@"@distinctUnionOfObjects.species"];
}

Now my “Used Species Array Controller” binds against FileOwner’s “speciesInUse” 
property - and the dependency is broken. 

All is well, goodnight everyone, and thanks a million for all the help.



> On 5 Nov 2018, at 1:04, Sandor Szatmari <admin.szatmari....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If you can, can you establish the binding programmatically after launch?  If 
> so, does the program crash once the bindings are re-established?  … 
> considering if it is a launch issue or more systematic? 
> 
> Sandor
> 
>> On Nov 4, 2018, at 17:25, Motti Shneor <motti.shn...@me.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Well, thanks Dave, Hunter, Richard and the rest.
>> 
>> I followed each of your suggestions, and I finally found the culprit. 
>> 
>> A single binding, rather a nifty one, which I don’t know how to do better — 
>> Maybe you can help.  Removing this binding (alas losing functionality) 
>> window opens instantly, regardless of the number of items.
>> 
>> First off — the issue is NOT in any of the table columns. They do have 
>> complicated bindings, but all work fast and fine.
>> 
>> In the .xib  there is also a custom view, only used as an accessory view to 
>> an NSAlert dialog, when user choses to perform special editing on the items 
>> displayed. (Kind of search-and-replace action).
>> 
>> In that view, there’s a popup button, populated by binding to a (quite 
>> special) array controller. That array controller’s content-array has the 
>> binding that breaks window loading.
>> 
>> I’ll try to explain: 
>> 
>> This NSTable in the window displays a list of all “Measurement” entities 
>> related to a specific “Sample” (the “representedObject” of the File’s 
>> owner). 
>> For that I have a “Measurements Array Controller” in “Entity” mode, whose 
>> content array is bound to File’s Owner’s “representedObject.measurements” 
>> relation. All table columns are bound to that array controller.
>> 
>> Now each Measurement is connected via to-one relation to a “Species” entity. 
>> 
>> In my custom view,  I wish to populate a popup button with all the Species 
>> entities which appear in the displayed Measurements.
>> 
>> For that, I created the “Used Species Array Controller” whose section in the 
>> .xib appears below:
>> 
>> 
>> <arrayController mode="entity" entityName="Species" editable="NO" 
>> automaticallyPreparesContent="YES" preservesSelection="NO" 
>> selectsInsertedObjects="NO" avoidsEmptySelection="NO" 
>> clearsFilterPredicateOnInsertion="NO" automaticallyRearrangesObjects="YES" 
>> id="syR-1c-VXy" userLabel="Used Species Array Controller">
>>   <connections>
>> BAD:  <binding destination="4l9-1K-ojl" name="contentArray" 
>> keyPath="arrangedObjects.@distinctUnionOfObjects.species" id="TQk-n5-RYc”/>
>>          <binding destination="-2" name="managedObjectContext" 
>> keyPath="representedObject.managedObjectContext" id="Vqg-dg-DdM"/>
>>          <binding destination="xYM-bl-Wzq" name="sortDescriptors" 
>> keyPath="sortDescriptors" id="3uW-GQ-bKN"/>
>>   </connections>
>> </arrayController>
>> 
>> 
>> The “Bad” binding destination, is the Measurements Array Controller’s 
>> “arrangedObjects”, and the model keyPath is “@distinctUnionOfObjects.species”
>> 
>> Effectively, when calculated, this “collects” all the species from all 
>> displayed measurements, removing any duplicates. Nifty, isn’t it?
>> 
>> I can’t provide the list statically, in advance, because the user is free to 
>> replace the species of displayed measurements - and although this is rather 
>> “heavy” binding - I can’t see anything “recursive” about it, or otherwise 
>> iteratively-dependent. I would guess this ArrayController should “Prepare” 
>> its content array once - and forget about it, until time any of the 
>> Measurements (arrangedObjects) mutate.
>> 
>> I know this isn’t easy to grasp… but any idea for how to improve this will 
>> be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> Thanks again! 
>> 
>> Motti Shneor
>> ---
>> Ceterum censeo Microsoftinem delendam esse
>> 
>> 
>>> On 4 Nov 2018, at 21:41, Dave Fernandes <dave.fernan...@utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 4, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Motti Shneor <motti.shn...@me.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Dave and thanks for the reply.
>>>> 
>>>> As you can see in the stack - there isn’t actually any “code” per-se that 
>>>> runs at that time. Here is the actual method that fails:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> As for modifying the persistent store - I guess I don’t because the 
>>>> database-document does not become “dirty”. If I double click one of the 
>>>> “sample” entities that can be open - and the window is shown as expected, 
>>>> then I close the document - there are no autosaves or changes recorded. 
>>>> The modification time of the persistent store does not change.
>>>> 
>>>> However - you’re right to point at 
>>>> NSManagedObjectContextDidChangeNotification — how could I get it to pop? 
>>> 
>>> Set up an observer for that notification for your MOC and set a breakpoint 
>>> in that observer.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 3 of my NSTableColumn do have a formatter for the number presented - but 
>>>> why should this affect the context, The columns are not “editable” 
>>>> in-place. 
>>> 
>>> Just trying to narrow this down without assuming too much.
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I will attempt to delete these columns and try again… 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> 
>> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
>> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>> 
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/admin.szatmari.net%40gmail.com
>> 
>> This email sent to admin.szatmari....@gmail.com

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to