Apparently the answer is that they should be declared nullable. Even though I've seen claims that the property will always return a set, apparently it's also allowable to assign it to nil to clear it out.
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 1:00 PM, David Catmull <davidcatm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm adding nullability notations to my Core Data classes for Swift > interoperability, and I need to know whether the properties for to-many > relationships should be considered nullable, or if they will always read as > empty sets. Is there an authoritative answer for this? > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
