On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Laurent Cerveau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 19, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> And as you can see, nothing has changed and the first line has certainly >>> not >>> been replaced by "bla". What am I doing wrong? >> >> Shouldn't you be using the -id flag, not -change? > > I usually do both of them (for framework embedding). E.g to make a framework > embeddable
Usually? I smell a cargo cult. > install_name_tool -change /Library/Frameworks/$EXECUTABLE_PATH > @executable_path/../Frameworks/$EXECUTABLE_PATH $EXECUTABLE_NAME > install_name_tool -id @executable_path/../Frameworks/$EXECUTABLE_PATH > $EXECUTABLE_NAME > > I think one option is about install path while the other is about > identification The man page says exactly what the options are for, no thought required. :-) The -id option sets the install name for a framework. The -change option is used when you want to modify something that's been linked to the framework. sherm-- -- Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
