On Aug 7, 2015, at 12:33 , Bill Cheeseman <wjcheese...@gmail.com> wrote: > > But by calling super the way I showed in my original post, I am not making > use of any result that might be returned by super's implementation of the > method. And how could super's implementation return anything meaningful to my > application anyway?
I agree it’s unclear, as it always is when overriding but calling super. The real question is, who’s in control of the value that the delegate method returns? I think you used ‘canCollapse…’ as an example, so how is it really determined whether collapsing is allowed? If the superclass is deciding, you should return its value. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
