Am 20.05.2008 um 09:47 Uhr schrieb Peter Duniho:
It's "Turing". As in "Alan Turing".
Thank you very much for pointing out that typo. -.-
Just because two languages are Turing-Complete, that doesn't mean that they will have equivalent implementations.
I didn't say that. You talked about "not working otherwise“ - that sounded a bit stronger than just different implementations.
...but I'd say that I'd expect an example significant enough to justify the hazards involved in the Cocoa paradigm would reduce the implementation size by _at least_ one order of magnitude.
That those are 'hazards' is just your opinion. To other people it's freedom.
As I said - a matter of personal preferences.
I admit, there are lots of people who don't mind dangerous programming environments.
If it was just half as dangerous as you make it sound, no single Mac would work reliably.
I could easily overlook how Objective-C works.
Now *that's* generous. :-) Andreas_______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
