Err, not sure how I mashed my signature there... On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Adam Baxter <volta...@voltagex.org> wrote:
> I think that depends on how far we're willing to go to avoid modifications >> to the original source. > > If we tried to provide grep with the failure code it expects, I think > > that would bring us into compatibility layer territory. Instead, we > > should just accept that that's how windows works and modify grep to > > account for it. > > > Sounds reasonable, but probably best to defer to Garrett and other people > who know more than me - do we focus on shallow forking the libraries, the > applications or take it on a case by case basis? How should the CoApp > project deal with the concepts of making the software work within the > Windows ecosystem, rather than going down the Cygwin route of bringing > Unixisms to Windows? (maybe that discussion belongs in a new thread?) > > > --Sfsm > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
