On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wmr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/16/2010 11:07 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Garrett Serack <garre...@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >>> Well, that was the idea... >>> >>> I suppose that typical config.h files might differ between the two, but >>> other than that, I can't think of a case where the header files would be >>> different. >>> >>> >>> But, it's not a *requirement*, just a >>> lack-of-caffeine-induced-delirium-idea... >> >> It should be possible to have both variants installed at the same time (IMO). > > Under Program Files/CoApp and Program Files (x86)/CoApp? Or how do you > envision > such parallel installs?
That sounds like an (implementation) detail. I'm not sure what the rules for PF and PF x86 are, but I'm sure something can be worked out. Speaking about Program Files, is there a goal to support per-user installs (so not requiring admin access)? Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
