Very interested in this one.  Intriguing sensor.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 21, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Dreuge via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Does anyone have experience with the Airmar WS-150WX?   
> 
> This is an ultra-sonic transducer that seems to measure just about 
> everything:  true/apparent wind, pressure, temp, gps, compas, pitch & roll, 
> NMEA 0183/2000.
> 
> I currently have a regular cable-run Raymarine wind system.   It always works.
> 
> 
> -
> Paul E.
> 1981 C&C Landfall 38 
> S/V Johanna Rose
> Fort Walton Beach, FL
> 
> http://svjohannarose.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 1:00 PM Marek Dziedzic via CnC-List 
>>> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I am starting to think about adding the wind instrument to the boat. The 
>>> main reason is for being able to feed the data (wind direction) to the 
>>> EV-100 autopilot.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I have a SeatalkNG network on the boat. I don’t have a Raymarine MFC, 
>>> though (I have a small Garmin chartplotter, instead).
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I am a minimalist (you could say “cheap”), so e.g., I don’t have a Navpod 
>>> on the binnacle; rather I have two individual RAM mount pods (for the 
>>> chartplotter and one for the p70s (the autopilot control head).
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I unstep the mast for every winter, so I am biased towards a wireless unit.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I have a few questions:
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> - Any recommendations for the wind instrument (Raymarine, Garmin, B&G)? My 
>>> first choice would be a unit that talks NMEA 2000 (SeatalkNG) (as opposed 
>>> to an analog unit that requires an extra device (iTC-5?) to connect. But 
>>> this is mainly to control the costs.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> - With limited space at the helm, what is the minimum requirement to feed 
>>> the wind data to the EV-100 autopilot? I don’t think I need the detailed 
>>> wind angle displayed, as long as the AP can follow. Though I could put the 
>>> wind display somewhere else (on the bulkhead?). But if that display is not 
>>> required AND I could save the cost by not including it, I might be fine 
>>> with that.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> - Any strong recommendations against the wireless?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> - Any other suggestions or recommendations?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Marek
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 1994 C270 ”Legato”
>>> 
>>> Ottawa, ON
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with 
>>> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use 
>>> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - 
>>> Stu
>> 
> 
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with 
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Reply via email to