This webpage is 3 years old but it does provide an email address at the
bottom you might try to see if they'll give you an update.

https://letstalktransportation.ca/electronic-visual-distress-signals-instead-of-pyrotechnic-signals

Ken H.

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 20:51, Marek Dziedzic via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> This is a question to Canadian list members…
>
>
>
> Has anyone researched the use of electronic flares (e.g., Sirius C-1001)
> as a replacement for the pyrotechnic flares in Canada? So far, I found that
> they can be used, but that they do not _*replace*_ the need for the
> proper flares (6 or 12 of them depending on the boat length).
>
>
>
> I know that in 2014 there was a movement to influence the change in the
> Transport Canada rules, but I did not find anything that would indicate
> that the change took place.
>
>
>
> Of course, USCG accepts the eFlares as a replacement to pyrotechnic
> flares, but this does not make any difference here.
>
>
>
> I had a look and my flares expired, so I need to buy something. It would
> be that much easier if I could buy an eFlare which has no expiration date.
>
>
>
> If you know anything on that topic, please share.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Marek Dziedzic
>
> 1994 C270 Legato
>
> Ottawa, ON
> Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with
> the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks
> - Stu
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Reply via email to