I suspect that you are correct, Dennis. 

 

If you look at the legend of a paper chart, it will tell you when the 
cartographic data was recorded. The last section of the ICW in North Carolina 
was dug in the mid 30’s, and much of the survey data was collected between the 
1930s and the 1950s – when accuracy was far below the plus or minus 10 feet you 
can get with modern GPS. There are sections around here where a boat in 
mid-channel will show to be 100 feet or more off to one side and on dry land. 
Segments that are regularly dredged or where markers have been moved in the 
past few years will have much more accurate cartographic data. The age and 
accuracy of the survey data is one of the reasons why NOAA no longer prints the 
“Magenta Line” on current ICW charts.

 

Another potential inaccuracy, somewhat spotty, is an actual proof that Einstein 
was correct in general relativity. The geosynchronous GPS constellation is has 
a velocity somewhat greater than that of the point below it on the Earth’s 
surface. General Relativity predicts that time moves more slowly as velocity 
increases. Consequently the clocks on the satellites get reset by a few 
milliseconds every couple of hours to match the official atomic clock. There 
was an article in a science magazine about the GPS system a few years ago, and 
the writer mentioned that on the day he visited the GPS system control center 
in Colorado there was a communication issue between the atomic clock and the 
control center for several hours – with the result that the GPS in the 
reporter’s car directed him to a spot more than ½ mile away from the GPS 
control location.

 

That’s why a prudent mariner uses multiple sources of navigation information – 
and why you need to keep your head out of the boat.

 

Rick Brass

Washington, NC

 

 

 

From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Dennis C. 
via CnC-List
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 1:42 PM
To: CnClist <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Cc: Dennis C. <capt...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Electronic navigation - chartplotters

 

The positions were accurate during the rest of the 178 nm trip except in that 
short section of the ICW.  My guess is the cartography was inaccurate there.

 

Dennis C.

 

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 12:34 PM Jerome Tauber via CnC-List 
<cnc-list@cnc-list.com <mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> > wrote:

  Is your GPS set to output positions using the corrrect Geodetic Datum?  Jerry

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis C. via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com> >
To: CnClist <CnC-List@cnc-list.com <mailto:CnC-List@cnc-list.com> >
Cc: Dennis C. <capt...@gmail.com <mailto:capt...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Tue, Dec 18, 2018 11:22 am
Subject: Stus-List Electronic navigation - chartplotters

Over the weekend I brought Touche' back home to Mandeville for the winter.  
Nice trip but a bit cold for my Southern blood.  Here's something I observed.

 

For those who rely exclusively on charplotters and electronic navigation, 
here's something you need to look at.  Go to Google Earth and enter the 
following in the search window:   30°18'2.24"N 87°37'34.10"W

 

That will take you to a marshy island in Portage Creek, a portion of the ICW 
near Orange Beach, AL.  That's where the GPS chartplotter showed the boat 
symbol representing Touche' was when Touche' was actually in the middle of the 
channel adjacent to island.  If I had been using the boat symbol for navigation 
and had been steering to keep the symbol mid-channel, Touche' would have been 
in the trees on the south bank of the ICW.

 

The GPS continued to show Touche' in the trees on the north bank during the 
entire transit of this section of the ICW.  Having navigated these waters 
dozens of times, I'm very familiar with them but a boater transiting here the 
first time in heavy fog............................

 

Once out of the man-made ICW the GPS returned to being fairly accurate.

 

Just saying, once again, how important it is to use your eyeballs and not rely 
on electronics exclusively for navigation.  Maybe it doesn't seem like a big 
deal when you're in a channel that is well marked but there are lots of areas 
with no marks, no land and seriously shallow shoals or rocks.

 

Dennis C.

Touche' 35-1 #83

Mandeville, LA

 

 

_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --  https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to