My Ray/Airmar stuff reads to 600, then reads a random number.  In the Gulf
Stream it must read thermal layers.

Joel

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> I sold a ton of Raytheon stuff back in the day that was supposed to read
> down to between 600 and 1500 feet. Modern combination GPS/fishfinder units
> should easily see 600 feet and some can pass 10,000 feet.
>
> Fishermen use these depth ranges. For sailing strictly to keep off a
> sandbar, the first 100 feet are important. I use a Standard Horizon DS41
> unit that fits in a 2” hole and can forward NMEA data.  In theory it reads
> 2-600 feet, but given my old transducer I have no idea if I could actually
> see that far. Offshore at night we used to see thermoclines and other stuff
> that looked like it was 300-400 feet deep.
>
> Joe
>
> Coquina
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of *Matthew
> L. Wolford via CnC-List
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:18
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Cc:* Matthew L. Wolford <wolf...@erie.net>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List New sonar transducer
>
>
>
> I wondered that, too.  I generally worry about less than 20 feet.
>
>
>
> *From:* Rick Brass via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:09 AM
>
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>
> *Cc:* Rick Brass <rickbr...@earthlink.net>
>
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List New sonar transducer
>
>
>
> Jeremy;
>
>
>
> In 24 years of keelboat ownership, covering several boats and several
> iterations of sounders and plotter/sounders from Raymarine, Garmin,
> Lawrence, and Standard Horizon, I don’t recall ever having a sounder that
> would work for depths over 200 feet. I suspect there are “professional”
> units that will do it, but also suspect they are more expensive than the
> units we would buy for our recreational boats.
>
>
>
> Maybe Fred Street can weigh in on what would be needed for greater depth.
>
>
>
> But my question is” Why do you need depths over 200 ft.?”
>
>
>
> Rick Brass
>
> Washington, NC
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com
> <cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Ralph via CnC-List
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 22, 2017 12:06 AM
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Cc:* Jeremy Ralph <jeremy.ra...@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Stus-List New sonar transducer
>
>
>
> Planning to install new thru hull transducer when I haul the boat in the
> coming weeks.  Trying to decide on: i) a simple depth only display, or ii)
> a more elaborate chart plotter with depth.
>
>
>
> For chart and depth, I currently use my iPhone in a waterproof case on a
> RAM mount. Navionics for charts and for depth a SonarPhone TBox with an
> in-hull transducer.  This works fine for my purposes but it would be good
> to have redundancy and something that works for deeper depths (>200ft).
>
>
>
> Any recommendations?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>   Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> wish to make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:
> https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>


-- 
Joel
301 541 8551
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to