I have a 1981 C&C 36, bought it about 6 years ago and I am very happy with
the boat. It is a bit tender, but in part that is because I have a 155%
genoa.
In looking at the pictures in the ad, it looks like the boat has not been
that well cared for.
I would suggest carefully looking at the rod rigging, I spent about $4000
redoing mine.
Other things I note- my boat has a keel stepped mast, whereas I see a
compression post on this boat.
The mattress in the quarter berth is not the right fit, looks like
something happened to the cushions

The price is pretty good, but if there is alot of work to be done, it could
add up quickly.

If the basics are good (engine, rigging, deck) and the issues are just
cosmetic, then it is probably a good deal.

One thing I wish I had done when I bought my boat was getting a rigging
survey. It would have pointed out rigging issues that the regular survey
did not find, and I could have negotiated a better price.

Hope this helps

David Folsom
Rebel Maid
C&C 36
San Diego

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Dave via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
wrote:

> For sure Joe, there will be much more variance boat to boat, and  anyway
> it's just one man's opinion.  (Well, I suppose two, cuz I agreed).  I.   I
> won't speak for the gentleman, but I remember the context, and the
> inference was not that earlier boats somehow lacked 'quality' relative to
> later, only that as manufacturers, c&c progressed .  (One would hope so,
> and I'm now comforted he did not suggest otherwise!)
>
>  To speak to the original post, Model-specific concerns are probably more
> relevant, as (to your point) is the condition of the specific boat.
> Really, they are all 'old'.
>
> Has blistering been an issue specific to any C&c production periods?
> Windstar (1985)  has had half-dozen tiny ones pop up, but nothing major.
>  (Again, To your point - my first boat, 1972 vintage, had none, ever,
> though it had some period-correct soggy deck coring - easily repaired in a
> boat with no hull liner)
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:02:32 -0400
> From: "Joe Della Barba" <j...@dellabarba.com>
> To: <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Possible upgrade to a C&C 36
> Message-ID: <002001d1ff3d$e933a960$bb9afc20$@dellabarba.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I would disagree. C&C has been through enough changes that I would not say
> they have a graph of quality heading only upwards*. It would not take long
> to find older boat X better than newer boat Y. Besides for that, the boats
> are old enough to have had very different lives.
>
>
>
> * remember that as of 1970, blisters were a thing that had not yet happened
>
>
>
> Joe Della Barba
>
> j...@dellabarba.com<mailto:j...@dellabarba.com <j...@dellabarba.com>>
>
> Coquina
>
> C&C 35 MK I
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you
> like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All
> Contributions are greatly appreciated!
>
>
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like 
what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are 
greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to